Science Behind Terrorism
Drew
Nelson
Professor
Shirk
POL357:
Global Politics of Terrorism
25
February 2018
Science Behind Terrorism
One major point that many do not consider
when they are thinking about terrorism is the science behind it. This does not
mean the methods or strategies of the acts, but the new technologies and fields
of research that emerged during the period that promoted the acts. This has
been seen with the development of the guillotine that fostered the Reign of
Terror in the late eighteenth century, the creation of dynamite or TNT that
helped the acts committed by the Anarchists of the late nineteenth century, and
the science of eugenics was present during the Holocaust enacted by the Nazi
Party of Germany in the twentieth century. *List the similarities* *List the
differences*
After the French Republic fell
deeply in debt, the Committee of Public Health and Safety lead by Maximilian Robespierre.
These rebels took over and began the Reign of Terror. This is lead to the
rebellion calling for and following through with the execution of their
enemies. At the end of the Reign of Terror, the rebellion claimed about 17,000
lives and mass hysteria throughout the country.[1]
During this time, the Committee used the guillotine, which is an instrument
that decapitates its victims and typically used publically. This instrument was
introduced in France in 1792.[2]
Next, the development of dynamite
which helped Anarchists complete their goal. Although in theory anarchism is
not violent, some participants thought it was the only way to convey their
message. They used many different tactics which mostly included assassinating
specific political figures. One of the most prominent ways to do this was
dynamite to cause a massive explosion. These explosions were much more
impactful then black powder which was previously used.[3]
Now, this could “shatter into tiny bits granite and other ricks of adamantine
hardness.”[4]
Finally, the Nazi Party in Germany
used eugenics to justify the murdering of Jewish, Black, and gay peoples, along
with other ethnic minorities. Eugenics is choosing heritable characteristics to
create offspring that are preferable.[5]
The Nazi Party used this science to justify the murdering of these peoples. The
Party and those who worked with them would send the oppressed peoples to concentration
camps where they would be murdered from gas chambers, or camps that made them
work until they died of exhaustion, or round them up and murder them.[6]
The science used to promote these
acts of terrorism have similarities and differences that aided the specific
instances. Firstly, the dynamite and guillotine were inventions used to carry
out the acts, while eugenics was a study that they thought justified their
murder. Dynamite and the guillotine were physical tools used to murder, while
eugenics was abstract. The Reign of Terror and Anarchists movement both
targeted political actors, while the Holocaust targeted specific identities.
The Reign of Terror was looking to start a new government, while the Nazi Party
was looking to govern and kill those who aren’t like them, and the Anarchists
were looking to overthrow and get rid of the government entirely. The Anarchist
period and the Holocaust accomplished only their goal of murdering specific
people but not their entire goal. But the Reign of Terror was successful to
create a new government with a successful revolution. Finally, the guillotine
and dynamite aren’t still used today in acts of terrorism because they probably
are not the most effective in accomplishing a goal. But, eugenics or white
supremacy, is still used today to terrorize communities and oppress them. The
inventions and science behind these terrorist acts promoted and provided an
environment that fostered the success that they achieved towards their goal.
Works Cited
Browning, Christopher R. “Initiation
to Mass Murder: The Jozefow Massacre.” Ordinary
Men. (1992).
Jensen, Richard. “Daggers, Rifles
and Dynamite: Anarchist Terrorism in Nineteen Century Europe.” Terrorism and Political Violence. 16:1.
(2004).
The Editors of Encyclopedia
Britannica. “Reign of Terror.” Britannica. Accessed February 21, 2018. https://www.britannica.com/event/Reign-of-Terror.
The Editors of
Encyclopedia Britannica. “Reign of Terror.” Britannica. Accessed February 21,
2018. https://www.britannica.com/topic/guillotine.
Wilson, Philip K. “Eugenics.”
Britannica. Accessed February 25, 2018. https://www.britannica.com/science/eugenics-genetics.
[1] The Editors of Encyclopedia
Britannica, “Reign of Terror,” Britannica, accessed February 21, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/event/Reign-of-Terror.
[2] The Editors of
Encyclopedia Britannica, “Guillotine,” Britannica, accessed February 21, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/topic/guillotine.
[3] Richard Jensen, “Daggers,
Rifles and Dynamite: Anarchist Terrorism in Nineteenth Century Europe,” Terrorism and Political Violence, 16:1,
(2004), 117.
[4] Jensen, “Daggers,”
117.
[5] Philip K. Wilson,
“Eugenics,” Britannica, accessed February 25, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/science/eugenics-genetics.
[6] Christopher R.
Browning, “Initiation to
Mass Murder: The Jozefow Massacre,” Ordinary
Men, (1992).
Drew,
ReplyDeleteTowards the end of reading your post, I realized that you explain just how complicated terrorism is. For instance, you said that eugenics was used as a justification for the Holocaust. Eugenics, the belief that through science and breeding society should eliminate mental illnesses or defects, sounds good in theory. Getting rid of suffering and things that might hinder a person's life sounds good; but know this not to be true. The guillotine was rationalized by French citizens as they watched their king and queen be murdered by the deadly machine. Acts of terrorism or the methodology behind them show how easy it is for evil people to get away with evil things for as long as they do. Well done.
Great post Drew! It was very intesersting to read about the science behind the Holocaust. I definitely agree with the fact that without all of these advances in technology & ideas such as eugenics the Nazi’s would not have been able to eliminate as many people as they did. I also liked how you mentioned quite a few of the terrorism acts we have gone over in class. Very good job!
ReplyDeleteHi Drew, I was really interested by in the comparisons you drew between science and acts of terrorism. I find it intriguing that each wave of violence employed a recent scientific/technological innovation and I believe it is something worth discussing. Could these acts have been perpetrated without the innovations? Probably not. I believe that your argument will probably be important throughout the remainder of the course in the next cases we investigate.
ReplyDelete