What is Terrorism?
Cassandra
Monteiro
Global Politics
of Terrorism
Professor Shirk
February 5th
2018
What is Terrorism?
Terrorism
occurs when a weak person or group of people who are involved in a struggle of
power premeditate an attack against a more powerful nation-state with the aim
of inflicting terror and fear among the group and people involved or within.
Terrorists use violence with attempts of getting their beliefs and ideas across
to others. Terrorism occurs when the group or person is rebelling the current
state and aims to get a response from the one’s in power. Motive is one of the
main keys in defining terrorism as there has to be a political or power motive involved.
Terrorism is not just a random attack for no reason, it is often made very
clear what the reason for the attack is as one of the goals is to get a
response from the people being attacked and for changes to be made.
Terrorism was not always as big of a
concern as it currently is, but has definitely existed for quite a while in
many different forms. In reading David Rapoports The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11 I was
informed of the way terrorism has formed into what it is today over the
centuries, though the definition of terrorism has pretty much remained the same
throughout the changes in our world. Motives may not all be the same but all
involve some type of power struggle for political power. He uses examples of
terrorism in which there was political violence against non-military targets by
non-state actors. The first wave he mentions is the “Anarchist Wave” occurring
during the 1880’s in which political assassinations were acted out by non-state
actors. Their aims were to eliminate the organized government and hierarchy.
This provides an example for the definition of terrorism because these groups
were attempting to make changes within the government by inflicting terror and
assassinating those in power. This was threatening to those who held any sort
of power at the time of these attacks and inflicted fear. The second wave was
the “Anti-Colonial Wave” which took place during the 1920’s. These terrorists
used guerilla warfare tactics to inform those in power that they wanted their
own government. Rebelling the state that their countries were currently in and
aiming to make changes within. Again, a group of people who hold a low power
status are aiming to change the political structure of a powerful state by
using terror and violence. The third wave was the “New Left Wave” which was
based off of nationalism. An example given for this kind of terrorism was the
IRA. The Irish Republican Army was using threatening tactics in order to
present the idea of a unified Ireland under Irish rule rather than British
rule. This example again shows a group of people who were involved in a power
struggle inflicting terror on a more powerful state in order to get a response.
The final wave according to Rapoport is the “Religious Wave” which still exists
today. In a time where religious identity is rather important to many, those
religious groups with lesser power or less of a following target a government
in order to recruit members and also to express their feelings about creating a
place where all members of that religion can come together. The states that
they attack are the ones in which they blame for the national lines that do not
allow for this to happen and often America is a target. This example is what we
often think of today when we hear the word terrorism, and the most recent
attacks of terrorism have been a part of this wave including the 9/11 attack
constructed by Osama bin Laden and attacks from ISIS.
Terrorism can come from within or
without of the powerful nation-state being attacked. There are many cases where
terrorist groups attack their own government and country for the fact that they
do not agree with the current state. This is called national terrorism as it
takes place within the country without any foreign involvement, the Oklahoma
City Bombing is an example of this type of terrorism. It can also come from
people from other parts of the world who do not agree with the government of
another country. This is international terrorism and an example of this is the
September 11th attack.
There have been many arguments
recently in which people have argued that we tend to stereotype who a terrorist
could be and what they may look like. In reality, it could be anyone. A
terrorist can be someone of any race, any gender, or any age. People have
argued in the case of the recent Las Vegas shooting that people strayed away
from calling the shooter a terrorist simply because he was white. In reality he
could have very well been a terrorist though we are not completely sure of his
motives. Which brings up the importance of motive in relation to what terrorism
is. Sometimes it can be hard to determine the motive of an attack or shooting
but often times in the case of terrorism the terrorist makes their motive very
clear in order to get a reaction.
Terrorism is not a random attack which
is pursued for no reason. Not every murder or shooting is an act of terrorism There
has to be a motive involved in the situation, and it has to be for a political
reason or a reason of power. The state departments definition agrees with this
idea of terrorism being pursued for political reasons defining it as “the
unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or
coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in
furtherance of political or social objectives". The objective and motive of the attack is the
key to defining something as an act of terrorism.
Acts of terrorism can range from
being a small act to larger more serious acts. Someone can kill one person with
the motive being political and this would be an act of terrorism. The reason is
because it is threatening and inflicts fear onto others, and of course the key
is the motive. After this act people may not feel safe, and would fear the
terrorists. The country would most likely be forced to take precautions and make
changes to protect their citizens. On the other hand, someone can go as far as
bombing civilians of that country leaving many injured or dead, and this is
also considered terrorism. There are a range of acts with different levels of
seriousness that someone can commit to be a terrorist. So long as they are inflicting
terror and threatening someone or some group having the motive and goals of
political changes.
Terrorism can happen anywhere, at
any place, and any time. In reading Terror,
Terrorism, and Terrorists by Charles Tilly he mentioned that former secretary
of state Colin Powell said “In this global campaign against terrorism, no
country has the luxury of remaining on the sidelines. There are no
sidelines. Terrorists respect no limits, geographic or moral. The frontlines
are everywhere and the stakes are high. Terrorism not only kills people. It
also threatens democratic institutions, undermines economies, and destabilizes
regions”. Tilly goes on to speak about terrorism as a tactic or strategy used
to inflict terror with the attempt to achieve a political goal. An attack makes
a target look vulnerable as Tilly mentions “In addition to whatever harm it
inflicts directly, it sends signals- signals that the target is vulnerable,
that the perpetrators exist, and that the perpetrators have the capacity to
strike again. The signals typically reach three different audiences: the
targets themselves, potential allies of the perpetrators, and third parties
that might cooperate with one or the other” (Tilly, 9). The terror inflicted on
a group has long lasting effects that are rather hard to overcome. A constant
fear can be instilled within the people living in this group.
There are many effects of terrorism
on a society. One of the main things a terrorist attack effects in the economy.
Attacks can lead to the death of many citizens, and can also damage buildings
and infrastructures within the area. A lot of money goes into rebuilding these
structures and buildings as well as getting the businesses within up and
running again. The government will more than likely have to put a lot of effort
into protection measures making sure another attack does not happen. Terrorism
also has societal impacts as it poses law and order issues creating suspicion
and fear within the society and leaving the civilians worried. Terrorism also
makes politics more difficult as they always have to consider the idea of an
attack and the impact it could have on the world.
Though there are so many different
definitions and ideas about terrorism it has become a more prevalent feature in
today’s world and all though the main motives may have changed over time the
key to a terrorist attack is the involvement it has within politics and power. Their
aim is to inflict fear within a society to attempt changes in political
concepts and ideals and this is the most important concept in defining what
terrorism is. As far who it is, it can be anybody. There are so many cases when
terrorism comes unexpected. These groups or people go through so much planning
and detail to make sure everything goes correctly and that their point comes across
clearly. It can be a national attack and come from within its own country or
can be international coming from as far as the other side of the world. Though
the acts can range in size and seriousness there are almost always economic,
social, and political effects involved with a terrorist attack.
Works Cited
Bobbit, Phillip. Terror and Consent:
The Wars for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.
Rappoport, Michael. “The Four Waves of
Rebel Terror and September 11”. Anthropoetics: The
Journal
of Generative Anthropology. UCLA. Accessed February 4, 2018.
Tilly, Charles. “Terror, Terrorism,
Terrorists.” Sociological Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, 2004, pp. 5–13
Stampnitzky, Lisa. Disciplining
Terror: How Experts Invented “Terrorism” Cambridge:
Cambridge
University Press.
Hi Cassie, I liked how you included examples from outside of the reading such as the Oklahoma City Bombing and the LAs Vegas shooting to explain terrorism. I like that the smaller paragraphs after your explanation of the definitions of terrorism digressed from the definition, while serving to further explain the points you found to be significant. If anything I would try to avoid repetition in those smaller paragraphs though, as it felt that sometimes they would enforce the same idea.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback Taylor! I definitely agree that I need to work on the repetition within my paper, it was something I struggled with but will focus on that when writing my next paper.
DeleteHi Cassie! In your essay, you were very clear on your argument which I thought was effective. In the beginning you discussed how terrorism comes from "a weak person or group of people," I wish that you had gone more into detail on why you believe terrorism cannot come from powerful actors like a country's government. Besides that, I believe that your argument was supported well with examples.
ReplyDeleteThank you Drew! I should have definitely considered adding that to my paper, and will be sure to include my thoughts on terrorism coming from more powerful actors when I write the second one.
DeleteGreat job, Cassie! I think you did a wonderful job framing your own personal definition of terrorism. By using examples of terrorism such as the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Las Vegas shooting you effectively described the definitions of scholars but also effectively described what you believe. You say that a terrorist could be anyone and my only suggestion is using more examples of terrorists as state actors and as non-state actors. Well done.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback Rachel! I do think adding that information would strengthen my paper and make my definition more clear. I will definitely take your advice into consideration when writing my next paper.
Delete