Who was responsible for Algeria's plight?
Algeria was once a colony of France
and finally the Algerians fought back to write their own destiny. Algerian War
for Independence was fought from 1954 to 1962 by multiple parties with
different ideologies. The clash of these ideologies caused an explosion of violence
that killed thousands. France, Pied Noir, and The National Liberation Front
(FLN) were the key parties during the Algerian War for Independence. Each party
inflicted violence on Algerian citizens causing mass havoc and lots of
bloodshed. It is important to note, however, that one crucial party involved in
this was a long-standing nation: France. France was and is a powerful country
that claimed many colonies yet it was acting like the aggressive and negligent colonies
that it claims. France is responsible for the violence that ensued and the impact
that the aggression left. The reason for the Pied Noir’s existence was to
support and fight for France’s rule in Algeria and it was France’s
responsibility to alleviate the aggression in Algeria.
On May 8, 1945, Muslims began to
protest in Algeria against French rule. The protest resulted in hundreds of pied noir deaths. Pied Noir translates
to “black feet” and this was the term that classified white settlers in
Algeria. The Pied Noir were French sympathizers that were supportive of French
rule. In retaliation to the protest, French armies murdered between 1,000 to
45,000 Muslims (Hitchen). This starting point of the revolution is one example
of the irresponsible tactics that France used during this time.
France’s reckless entanglement with
Algeria continued. In 1954, the National Liberation Front (FLN) became
frustrated by France’s hostility and began launching attacks throughout
Algeria, demanding sovereignty. France deploys their troops to monitor the situation
(Hitchens). This is another example of France’s mistake in the situation.
Rather than exercising diplomacy and begin negotiations with Algeria, it
deploys a military force to “monitor the situation”. The following events could
have been avoided if France acted wiser.
The following year, the FLN begins
to target civilians. Targeting civilians was perceived as the only option for
revolutionaries because it was the only way to get attention and make their cause
known. The Earth Liberation Front (ELF) was an advocate of property violence
because it was the only way for them to gain attention for their cause. The ELF
started with peaceful protests and shifted to more violent outbursts because
nothing would change; they realized they would still be met with violent force
by the authorities no matter how peaceful or violent their protests were. The
FLN’s passionate and ferocious strategies against Algeria did not intimidate
France and France’s reaction only escalated FLN’s plans. Despite 120 French
Algerian deaths and 1,200-12,000 Muslim deaths, the governor-general of French
Algeria, Jaques Soustelle, would not compromise with revolutionaries. In 1956,
the FLN starts to attack urban areas of Algeria (Hitchens).
In 1958, the Pied Noir inflicted
attacks out of frustration because France did nothing to suppress the revolutionaries.
Finally, with the support of the French Army, the Pied Noir demand that Charles
de Gaulle be put as Algeria’s leader. The French National Assembly approves and
de Gaulle is approved by the French and Muslims. In the years to follow, give
and take between de Gaulle, the Pied Noir, and the FLN continued until
independence is declared in Algeria in 1962 (Hitchens).
Independence was finally declared
in Algeria despite the fact that negotiations could have started in the
beginning stages of revolts. France had numerous opportunities to intervene and
put a stop to the violence. Even the Pied Noir grew frustrated over France’s
absence. If France had cooperated with the FLN and discouraged Pied Noir’s
violence in the name of France, thousands of lives could have been saved and
independence could have been achieved sooner.
Hitchens, Christopher. “A Chronology of the Algerian War of Independence.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 1 Nov. 2006, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/11/a-chronology-of-the-algerian-war-of-independence/305277/.
Hey Rachel,
ReplyDeleteNice post I liked how you focused on the beginnings of the conflict and what truly brought it about. I feel like you touch upon a theme throughout history, in which a European colonial power such as France will do anything to hold onto its territory. The same can be said in regard to French Indochina. Although they can claim that they felt as though Algeria was a part of the state and that is the reason that they did not want to give it up, it is ironic to do so. Their revolution was about the people's will to have a fair and just representative government which is basically what the Algerian people sought to establish in the mid 1950s.
Rachel,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading about this topic and thought you did a great job going into details about how France can really be blamed in this case. I can definitely see how they are responsible for the violence because they had been unwilling to cooperate and would do anything to remain as powerful as they could. They never really made any attempts to stop the violence and were only making the Algerian people more frustrated, leading to more chaos. I can definitely see where you are coming from in blaming them for the actions of the Algerian people.
Overall great job!
Great post Rachel! It is incredibly important to recognize that France could have stepped in to prevent so many deaths. I thought that you made some great points throughout the blog that carried your argument well.
ReplyDelete